Jun 30 2012

    

The Spirit Is the Initiator

Filed under God,Salvation,Spirit

The following verses show that the initiator of our faith is the Holy Spirit. For apart from the Holy Spirit we could not call upon the name of the Lord.

For “whoever calls on the name of the LORD shall be saved.”
Romans 10:13 (NKJV)

Therefore I make known to you that no one speaking by the Spirit of God calls Jesus accursed, and no one can say that Jesus is Lord except by the Holy Spirit.
1 Corinthians 12:3 (NKJV)

Comments Off on The Spirit Is the Initiator

Jun 24 2012

    

Just How Free Is Man's Will?

Filed under Living,Theology

There is the “age old” question about whether, or not, man has a free will. Most people misunderstand the issue regarding free will. Most think it means does man have choice. That isn’t really the issue. The issue is more correctly asked, is man’s choice totally free of influence that would cause his decision to go one way or the other. A libertarian free will is defined as one where man is absolutely free in making choices, where nothing causes his decision apart from the decision making choice. A free will of inclination says that man’s choice is influenced in some manner that will cause him to choose one way or another. Most who hold to the free will of inclination will put it that man’s choice is subject to his nature. A common illustration is that if a man jumps from the top of a building, no matter how hard he chooses to, he will not be able to fly. He cannot choose to fly because flying is not within man’s nature.

There is disagreement about this issue amongst both philosophers and theologians. All I wanted to do here is list a number of Scriptures that I believe pertain to the subject. And as you read them, ask yourself, do these Scriptures describe man as a libertarian free person, or a person who chooses subject to their human nature. Remember, the issue is NOT whether or not a person chooses. But just how free is their choice from causal influences.

[Romans 3:23 NKJV] for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,

[Job 14:4 NKJV] Who can bring a clean [thing] out of an unclean? No one!

[Job 15:14, 16 NKJV] What [is] man, that he could be pure? And [he who is] born of a woman, that he could be righteous? … How much less man, [who is] abominable and filthy, Who drinks iniquity like water!

[Job 25:4 NKJV] How then can man be righteous before God? Or how can he be pure [who is] born of a woman?

[Jeremiah 17:9 NKJV] The heart [is] deceitful above all [things], And desperately wicked; Who can know it?

[Jeremiah 16:12 NKJV] And you have done worse than your fathers, for behold, each one follows the dictates of his own evil heart, so that no one listens to Me.

[Psalms 53:1-3 NKJV] The fool has said in his heart, “[There is] no God.” They are corrupt, and have done abominable iniquity; [There is] none who does good. God looks down from heaven upon the children of men, To see if there are [any] who understand, who seek God. Every one of them has turned aside; They have together become corrupt; [There is] none who does good, No, not one.”

[Proverbs 28:26 NKJV] He who trusts in his own heart is a fool, But whoever walks wisely will be delivered.

[Ecclesiastes 9:3 NKJV] This [is] an evil in all that is done under the sun: that one thing [happens] to all. Truly the hearts of the sons of men are full of evil; madness [is] in their hearts while they live, and after that [they go] to the dead.

[Matthew 15:19 NKJV] For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies.

[Mark 7:21-22 NKJV] For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lewdness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness.

[Mark 10:18 NKJV] So Jesus said to him, “Why do you call Me good? No one [is] good but One, [that is], God.”

[1 Corinthians 6:9-10 NKJV] Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.

[Galatians 5:19-21 NKJV] Now the works of the flesh are evident, which are: adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lewdness, idolatry, sorcery, hatred, contentions, jealousies, outbursts of wrath, selfish ambitions, dissensions, heresies, envy, murders, drunkenness, revelries, and the like; of which I tell you beforehand, just as I also told [you] in time past, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.

[Ephesians 2:1-3 NKJV] And you [He made alive], who were dead in trespasses and sins, in which you once walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit who now works in the sons of disobedience, among whom also we all once conducted ourselves in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, just as the others.

[Ephesians 5:3-6 NKJV] But fornication and all uncleanness or covetousness, let it not even be named among you, as is fitting for saints; neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor coarse jesting, which are not fitting, but rather giving of thanks. For this you know, that no fornicator, unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience.

[Colossians 3:5-9 NKJV] Therefore put to death your members which are on the earth: fornication, uncleanness, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry. Because of these things the wrath of God is coming upon the sons of disobedience, in which you yourselves once walked when you lived in them. But now you yourselves are to put off all these: anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy, filthy language out of your mouth. Do not lie to one another, since you have put off the old man with his deeds,

[1 Timothy 1:9-10 NKJV] knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for [the] lawless and insubordinate, for [the] ungodly and for sinners, for [the] unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, for fornicators, for sodomites, for kidnappers, for liars, for perjurers, and if there is any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine,

[2 Timothy 3:2-5 NKJV] For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away!

[Titus 3:3 NKJV] For we ourselves were also once foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving various lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful and hating one another.

[Galatians 4:7-9 NKJV] Therefore you are no longer a slave but a son, and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ. But then, indeed, when you did not know God, you served those which by nature are not gods. But now after you have known God, or rather are known by God, how [is it that] you turn again to the weak and beggarly elements, to which you desire again to be in bondage?

It sure seems to me that above verses show man as one in bondage to sin and their own sinful nature! I would vote that yes man has free will, but it is free will of inclination. Man chooses what he most desires subject to his sinful nature.

 

Comments Off on Just How Free Is Man's Will?

Jun 15 2012

    

Are All Things Decreed by God?

Filed under God,Sovereignty

There is a certain view in theology that believes God decrees every event that has or will occur. This view is taken from verses such as the following:

(Eph 1:11 ESV) In him we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to the purpose of him who works all things according to the counsel of his will,

Granted that Ephesians 1:11 does indicate that God works all things to His purpose and according to the counsel of His will.  But, is it the same to say “that God works all things” and ” that God decrees all things.”  I have to say quite unequivocally “NO!”  The reason is nothing less than the Word of God.  Let’s take a look at these verses.

(Jer 19:3-6 ESV) 3You shall say, ‘Hear the word of the LORD, O kings of Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem. Thus says the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel: Behold, I am bringing such disaster upon this place that the ears of everyone who hears of it will tingle. 4Because the people have forsaken me and have profaned this place by making offerings in it to other gods whom neither they nor their fathers nor the kings of Judah have known; and because they have filled this place with the blood of innocents, 5and have built the high places of Baal to burn their sons in the fire as burnt offerings to Baal, which I did not command or decree, nor did it come into my mind– 6therefore, behold, days are coming, declares the LORD, when this place shall no more be called Topheth, or the Valley of the Son of Hinnom, but the Valley of Slaughter.

(Jer 7:30-31 ESV) 30“For the sons of Judah have done evil in my sight, declares the LORD. They have set their detestable things in the house that is called by my name, to defile it. 31And they have built the high places of Topheth, which is in the Valley of the Son of Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire, which I did not command, nor did it come into my mind.

(Jer 32:35 ESV) They built the high places of Baal in the Valley of the Son of Hinnom, to offer up their sons and daughters to Molech, though I did not command them, nor did it enter into my mind, that they should do this abomination, to cause Judah to sin.

How do we explain these apparent differences?  Well, I can only surmise that when the word tells us “God ordains something,” there is a difference than to say “God decrees something.”  The explanation might be in our concept of what God’s sovereignty means.  Theology recognizes a “meticulous sovereignty” versus a more “general sovereignty.”   C. Michael Patton has provided a detailed analysis of at least four views of the sovereignty of God, at his Parchment and Pen blog.  Maybe our difference is properly explained in the differentiations noted therein.

  1. Meticulous sovereignty: God is the instrumental cause behind every action and reaction there has ever been. For this view, in order for God to be truly sovereign, he must be the ultimate and instrumental cause for everything, including sin.
  2. Providential sovereignty: God is bringing about his will in everything (Eph 1:11). However,  his will is not the instrumental cause of all that happens. God’s will plays a providential role in “causing” all things, using secondary causes as instruments. What God wills is not always what he would want in a perfect world, but all he has is sin to work with. Therefore, in this sense, even evil is the will of God.
  3. Providential oversight: Here God’s sovereignty is expressed in active oversight. He has a general plan, but is not married to the details. God can and often does intervene in the affairs of humanity to bring about his purpose. In this case he never “wills” evil; he only uses it.
  4. Influential oversight: Here God limits his own sovereignty. God could control things, but to preserve human freedom, he will not intervene in the affairs of men to the degree that human freedom is effected. He is hopeful that his influence will be persuasive to change a person’s heart or to guide them to his will. Here God never wills evil, but only allows it.

Comments Off on Are All Things Decreed by God?

May 26 2012

    

The People of Law and of Grace by Luther

A sermon by Martin Luther on Law and Grace.

[sws_divider_bar5 barsize=”500″] [/sws_divider_bar5]

The People of Law and of Grace
Sermon for the Sunday after Christmas; Galatians 4:1-7

By Martin Luther

This text is very characteristic of the apostle Paul. It is not generally understood. Not because of any obscurity in itself, but because the doctrine of faith, a doctrine it is very necessary to understand if we are to comprehend Paul, for his energetic and zealous mind is, in all his epistles, occupied with the subject of faith–because, I say, this doctrine is almost obsolete in the world today. A lengthy exposition is necessary to make it plain. To gain space to treat the subject clearly, we will let this suffice for the introduction.

MAN’S JUSTIFICATION.

We must know it is one thing to handle the subject of good works and another that of justification; just as the nature or personality of an individual is one thing and his actions or works another. Justification has reference to the person and not to the works. It is the former, not the latter, which is justified and saved, or is sentenced and punished.

There is more to read!

Comments Off on The People of Law and of Grace by Luther

May 25 2012

    

Justification, an Exposition by Ryle

J. C. Ryle has an excellent exhortation on the subject of the Justification of the believer.

[sws_divider_bar5 barsize=”500″] [/sws_divider_bar5]

JUSTIFICATION!
An Exposition By Bishop J. C. Ryle

“Being justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ.” Romans 5:1

There is a word in the text which heads this page which ought to be very precious in the eyes of Englishmen. That word is “peace.”

Even in “merry England” we have known something of the horrors of war in the last thirty years. The Crimean war, the Indian mutiny, the Chinese, Abyssinian, and Ashantee wars have left deep marks on the history of our country.

We have tasted some of the tremendous evils which war, however just and necessary, brings in its train. Battle and disease have done their deadly work among our gallant soldiers and sailors. Gentle and simple blood has been shed like water in far distant lands. Many of the best and bravest of our countrymen are lying cold in untimely graves. Hearts in England have been broken by sudden, stunning, crushing bereavements. Mourning has been put on in many a palace, and many a cottage. The light of hundreds of happy firesides has been quenched. The mirth of thousands of homes is gone. Alas, we have learned by bitter experience, what a blessed thing is peace!

I desire, however, to call the attention of all who read this paper to the best of all peace—even peace with God. I would gladly speak to you of a peace which this world can neither give nor take away—a peace which depends on no earthly governments, and needs no carnal weapons, either to win it or preserve it—a peace which is freely offered by the King of kings, and is within the reach of all who are willing to receive it.

There is such a thing as “peace with God.” It may be felt and known. My heart’s desire and prayer is that you may be able to say with the Apostle Paul, “Being justified by faith, I have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ.” (Rom. 5:1.)

There is more to read!

Comments Off on Justification, an Exposition by Ryle

May 25 2012

    

Justification and Sanctification

Here is an essay by J.C. Ryle on the issue of the differences between the theological concepts of justification and sanctification.

[sws_divider_bar4 barsize=”500″] [/sws_divider_bar4]

Justification and Sanctification
How Do They Differ?
by J. C. Ryle

 

I now propose to consider, in the last place, the distinction between justification and sanctification. Wherein do they agree, and wherein do they differ?

This branch of our subject is one of great importance, though I fear it will not seem so to all my readers. I shall handle it briefly, but I dare not pass it over altogether. Too many are apt to look at nothing but the surface of things in religion, and regard nice distinctions in theology as questions of “words and names,” which are of little real value. But I warn all who are in earnest about their souls, that the discomfort which arises from not “distinguishing things that differ“ in Christian doctrine is very great indeed; and I especially advise them, if they love peace, to seek clear views about the matter before us. Justification and sanctification are two distinct things we must always remember. Yet there are points in which they agree and points in which they differ. Let us try to find out what they are.

There is more to read!

Comments Off on Justification and Sanctification

May 23 2012

    

Sowing and Reaping

Filed under Living

Following are some of the Biblical references noted in the Thompson Chain Reference Bible under the heading:

 

Sowing and Reaping:

  • SOWING EVIL, on the part of the wicked
    Job 4:8
    Proverbs 6:14
    Proverbs 16:28
    Proverbs 22:8
    Hosea 8:7
    Galatians 6:8
  • REAPING, harvest of sin
    • Disappointing
      Isaiah 17:11
    • Profitless
      Jeremiah 12:13
      Jeremiah 51:33
      Hosea 6:11
      Hosea 8:7
    • Reaped at the Judgment Day
      Joel 3:12
      Joel 3:13
    • According to the Seed Sown
      Galatians 6:7
      Galatians 6:8
    • Sure to Come in the Fulness of Time
      Revelation 14:15
    • SEE Sin’s; Misery
    • SEE Wages of Sin
  • SOWING, SPIRITUAL, the blessings of
    Psalms 126:5
    Psalms 126:6
    Proverbs 11:18
    Isaiah 32:20
    Hosea 10:12
    Luke 8:5
    Galatians 6:8
    SEE Reward
  • HARVEST, SPIRITUAL, general references to
    Psalms 126:6
    Hosea 10:12
    Matthew 9:37
    Mark 4:29
    Luke 10:2
    John 4:35
    John 4:36
    Galatians 6:9

Comments Off on Sowing and Reaping

May 23 2012

    

Ante-Nicene Premillennialists

Filed under End Times

Following is some of the requested info re: premillennialism.

1. Pre-millennial Leaders in the Early Church. Following are some of the notable premillennial disciples/writers in the early church.

  • Barnabus (~100 AD)
  • Polycarp(70-155-160 AD)
  • Pothinus (87-177 AD)
  • Irenaeus(120-202 AD)
  • Justin Martyr (100-165 AD)
  • Tertullian (150-225 AD)
  • Papias, Bishop of Hierapolis (60-130/155AD)
  • Tatian (110-172 AD)
  • Apollinaris (175 AD)
  • Clement, Bishop of Rome (90-100 AD)
  • Cyprian (200-258 AD)
  • Hegesippus (Second Century)
  • Melito (~190 AD)

Of special note in the above list are Polycarp, Irenaeus and Justin Martyr. Polycarp was a direct disciple of the Apostle John (the writer of Revelation) and at the same time when Revelation was written. Therefore, it is reasonable that John would have directly taught Polycarp about this subject. And Polycarp was premillennial. Carry this on to the next level, since Irenaeus was a direct disciple of Polycarp, and Irenaeus was premillennial. Then Justin Martyr a contemporary of Irenaeus, both premillennialists, wrote the work, Against Heresies to document what Christians believe. I attached an interesting article from Dr. Michael Vlach of The Master’s Seminary, who traces the premillennial beliefs of the early church chronologically around the time of the Apostle John and geographically around John’s ministry.

2. While we could find quotes in the writings of the above, a “shortcut” would be to review the following notable researchers.

  • Philip Schaff, in his seminal work The History of the Christian Church, noted the following:

    The Apostolic Fathers and the early church were definitely premillennial in their thinking. In fact, Church historian, Phillip Schaff, wrote the following: The most striking point in the eschatology of the ante-Nicene age is the prominent chiliasm, or millennarianism, that is the belief of a visible reign of Christ in glory on earth with the risen saints for a thousand years, before the general resurrection and judgment. It was indeed not the doctrine of the church embodied in any creed or form of devotion, but a widely current opinion of distinguished teachers, such as Barnabas, Papias, Justin Martyr, Irenaeus, Tertullian, Methodius, and Lactantius; [1]

    [1] Phillip Schaff. The History of the Christian Church, Vol. 2 (New York: Charles Scribner & Company, 1884), p. 482.

  • Thomas Burnet, Royal Chaplain to King William III of England, documented the Ante-Nicene history of premillennialism for the King, in the late 1600’s.

    And to make few words of it, we will lay down this conclusion, that the Millennial kingdom of Christ was the general doctrine of the Primitive Church, from the times of the Apostles to the Nicene Council; inclusively. [2]

    [2] Thomas Burnet, The Sacred Theory of the Earth (London: J. McGowan, 1681), 346.

    Note even the fact that in the 1600’s they were discussing premillennialism from a historical standpoint, shows that it did not start with Darby in the 1800’s.

Comments Off on Ante-Nicene Premillennialists

May 22 2012

    

Divine Control of Man

Filed under God,Sovereignty,Theology

Following are some of the Biblical references noted in the Thompson Chain Reference Bible under the heading:

 

Control, Divine:

  • Manifested in the Control of Men
    • 2 Kings 19:28
    • Job 12:19
    • Proverbs 21:1
    • Isaiah 37:29
    • Isaiah 44:25
    • Ezekiel 29:4
    • Ezekiel 38:4
    • Ezekiel 39:2

Here are some additional verses that apply that were not included in Thompson:

  • Genesis 11:9
  • Exodus 14:4
  • Psalm 37:23
  • Proverbs 16:9
  • Isaiah 40:23
  • Jeremiah 15:11; 16:21; 17:4
  • Revelation 17:17

 

Comments Off on Divine Control of Man

Apr 24 2012

    

Tyndale on the Power of the Scriptures

The following is taken from William Tyndale’s Prologue to his New Testament translation printed in 1525 A.D. As shown, William Tyndale held a very strong view of God’s sovereignty in the salvation of believers.

When the evangelion is preached, the Spirit of God entereth into them which God hath ordained and appointed unto eternal life; and openth their inward eyes, and worketh such belief in them.

Comments Off on Tyndale on the Power of the Scriptures

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »