Archive for the 'Theology' Category

Jun 24 2012

Just How Free Is Man's Will?

Filed under Living,Theology

There is the “age old” question about whether, or not, man has a free will. Most people misunderstand the issue regarding free will. Most think it means does man have choice. That isn’t really the issue. The issue is more correctly asked, is man’s choice totally free of influence that would cause his decision to go one way or the other. A libertarian free will is defined as one where man is absolutely free in making choices, where nothing causes his decision apart from the decision making choice. A free will of inclination says that man’s choice is influenced in some manner that will cause him to choose one way or another. Most who hold to the free will of inclination will put it that man’s choice is subject to his nature. A common illustration is that if a man jumps from the top of a building, no matter how hard he chooses to, he will not be able to fly. He cannot choose to fly because flying is not within man’s nature.

There is disagreement about this issue amongst both philosophers and theologians. All I wanted to do here is list a number of Scriptures that I believe pertain to the subject. And as you read them, ask yourself, do these Scriptures describe man as a libertarian free person, or a person who chooses subject to their human nature. Remember, the issue is NOT whether or not a person chooses. But just how free is their choice from causal influences.

[Romans 3:23 NKJV] for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,

[Job 14:4 NKJV] Who can bring a clean [thing] out of an unclean? No one!

[Job 15:14, 16 NKJV] What [is] man, that he could be pure? And [he who is] born of a woman, that he could be righteous? … How much less man, [who is] abominable and filthy, Who drinks iniquity like water!

[Job 25:4 NKJV] How then can man be righteous before God? Or how can he be pure [who is] born of a woman?

[Jeremiah 17:9 NKJV] The heart [is] deceitful above all [things], And desperately wicked; Who can know it?

[Jeremiah 16:12 NKJV] And you have done worse than your fathers, for behold, each one follows the dictates of his own evil heart, so that no one listens to Me.

[Psalms 53:1-3 NKJV] The fool has said in his heart, “[There is] no God.” They are corrupt, and have done abominable iniquity; [There is] none who does good. God looks down from heaven upon the children of men, To see if there are [any] who understand, who seek God. Every one of them has turned aside; They have together become corrupt; [There is] none who does good, No, not one.”

[Proverbs 28:26 NKJV] He who trusts in his own heart is a fool, But whoever walks wisely will be delivered.

[Ecclesiastes 9:3 NKJV] This [is] an evil in all that is done under the sun: that one thing [happens] to all. Truly the hearts of the sons of men are full of evil; madness [is] in their hearts while they live, and after that [they go] to the dead.

[Matthew 15:19 NKJV] For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies.

[Mark 7:21-22 NKJV] For from within, out of the heart of men, proceed evil thoughts, adulteries, fornications, murders, thefts, covetousness, wickedness, deceit, lewdness, an evil eye, blasphemy, pride, foolishness.

[Mark 10:18 NKJV] So Jesus said to him, “Why do you call Me good? No one [is] good but One, [that is], God.”

[1 Corinthians 6:9-10 NKJV] Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals, nor sodomites, nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor extortioners will inherit the kingdom of God.

[Galatians 5:19-21 NKJV] Now the works of the flesh are evident, which are: adultery, fornication, uncleanness, lewdness, idolatry, sorcery, hatred, contentions, jealousies, outbursts of wrath, selfish ambitions, dissensions, heresies, envy, murders, drunkenness, revelries, and the like; of which I tell you beforehand, just as I also told [you] in time past, that those who practice such things will not inherit the kingdom of God.

[Ephesians 2:1-3 NKJV] And you [He made alive], who were dead in trespasses and sins, in which you once walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit who now works in the sons of disobedience, among whom also we all once conducted ourselves in the lusts of our flesh, fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the mind, and were by nature children of wrath, just as the others.

[Ephesians 5:3-6 NKJV] But fornication and all uncleanness or covetousness, let it not even be named among you, as is fitting for saints; neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor coarse jesting, which are not fitting, but rather giving of thanks. For this you know, that no fornicator, unclean person, nor covetous man, who is an idolater, has any inheritance in the kingdom of Christ and God. Let no one deceive you with empty words, for because of these things the wrath of God comes upon the sons of disobedience.

[Colossians 3:5-9 NKJV] Therefore put to death your members which are on the earth: fornication, uncleanness, passion, evil desire, and covetousness, which is idolatry. Because of these things the wrath of God is coming upon the sons of disobedience, in which you yourselves once walked when you lived in them. But now you yourselves are to put off all these: anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy, filthy language out of your mouth. Do not lie to one another, since you have put off the old man with his deeds,

[1 Timothy 1:9-10 NKJV] knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for [the] lawless and insubordinate, for [the] ungodly and for sinners, for [the] unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, for fornicators, for sodomites, for kidnappers, for liars, for perjurers, and if there is any other thing that is contrary to sound doctrine,

[2 Timothy 3:2-5 NKJV] For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away!

[Titus 3:3 NKJV] For we ourselves were also once foolish, disobedient, deceived, serving various lusts and pleasures, living in malice and envy, hateful and hating one another.

[Galatians 4:7-9 NKJV] Therefore you are no longer a slave but a son, and if a son, then an heir of God through Christ. But then, indeed, when you did not know God, you served those which by nature are not gods. But now after you have known God, or rather are known by God, how [is it that] you turn again to the weak and beggarly elements, to which you desire again to be in bondage?

It sure seems to me that above verses show man as one in bondage to sin and their own sinful nature! I would vote that yes man has free will, but it is free will of inclination. Man chooses what he most desires subject to his sinful nature.

 

Comments Off on Just How Free Is Man's Will?

May 22 2012

Divine Control of Man

Filed under God,Sovereignty,Theology

Following are some of the Biblical references noted in the Thompson Chain Reference Bible under the heading:

 

Control, Divine:

  • Manifested in the Control of Men
    • 2 Kings 19:28
    • Job 12:19
    • Proverbs 21:1
    • Isaiah 37:29
    • Isaiah 44:25
    • Ezekiel 29:4
    • Ezekiel 38:4
    • Ezekiel 39:2

Here are some additional verses that apply that were not included in Thompson:

  • Genesis 11:9
  • Exodus 14:4
  • Psalm 37:23
  • Proverbs 16:9
  • Isaiah 40:23
  • Jeremiah 15:11; 16:21; 17:4
  • Revelation 17:17

 

Comments Off on Divine Control of Man

Apr 24 2012

Tyndale on the Power of the Scriptures

The following is taken from William Tyndale’s Prologue to his New Testament translation printed in 1525 A.D. As shown, William Tyndale held a very strong view of God’s sovereignty in the salvation of believers.

When the evangelion is preached, the Spirit of God entereth into them which God hath ordained and appointed unto eternal life; and openth their inward eyes, and worketh such belief in them.

Comments Off on Tyndale on the Power of the Scriptures

Aug 31 2011

The Definition of the Council of Chalcedon (451 A.D)

Filed under God,Jesus Christ,Theology

Following is the dogmatic Christological definition from the Council of Chalcedon, which was held from 8 October to 1 November, 451 AD.

Therefore, following the holy fathers, we all with one accord teach men to acknowledge one and the same Son, our Lord Jesus Christ, at once complete in Godhead and complete in manhood, truly God and truly man, consisting also of a reasonable soul and body; of one substance with the Father as regards his Godhead, and at the same time of one substance with us as regards his manhood; like us in all respects, apart from sin; as regards his Godhead, begotten of the Father before the ages, but yet as regards his manhood begotten, for us men and for our salvation, of Mary the Virgin, the God-bearer; one and the same Christ, Son, Lord, Only-begotten, recognized in two natures, without confusion, without change, without division, without separation; the distinction of natures being in no way annulled by the union, but rather the characteristics of each nature being preserved and coming together to form one person and subsistence, not as parted or separated into two persons, but one and the same Son and Only-begotten God the Word, Lord Jesus Christ; even as the prophets from earliest times spoke of him, and our Lord Jesus Christ himself taught us, and the creed of the fathers has handed down to us.

Comments Off on The Definition of the Council of Chalcedon (451 A.D)

Apr 09 2011

Christ’s Humiliation and Exaltation

The following outline about the humiliation and exaltation of Jesus Christ is taken from the book, Twelve Baskets Full of Original Bible Outlines.1

 

Seven Steps in His Humiliation
Philippians 2:7-8

  1. Made Himself of no reputation.
  2. Took upon Himself the form of a slave.
  3. Made in the likeness of men.
  4. Found in fashion as a men.
  5. Humbled Himself.
  6. Became obedient unto death.
  7. Even the death of the Cross.

 

Seven Steps in His Exaltation
Philippians 2:9-11

  1. God hath highly exalted Him—Humanity occupying the highest place in the universe.
  2. Given Him a Name which is above every name.
  3. At the name of Jesus every knee shall bow.
  4. Of things in heaven.
  5. And things on earth.
  6. And things under the earth.
  7. And every tongue confess that Jesus is Lord.



1. “Christ’s Humiliation and Exaltation,” Twelve Baskets Full of Original Bible Outlines, Pickering Hy. (Editor). London: Pickering & Inglis, 1918. p. 13.


Comments Off on Christ’s Humiliation and Exaltation

Apr 07 2011

The Trinity

The following definition is given by Dr. Bruce Ware in the seminar he conducted at The Master’s Seminary on The Universal Reign of the Triune God.

God’s whole and undivided essence belongs equally, eternally, simultaneously, and fully to each of the three Persons of the Godhead, so that the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit each is fully God while each is his own personal expression, in role and activity, of the one eternal and undivided divine essence.

Comments Off on The Trinity

Apr 05 2011

Inexact Quotations vs. Inerrancy

Filed under Bibliology,Theology

Do inexact quotations of Old Testament texts in the New Testament show that Scripture is not inerrant? Here is a excerpt of an article by A.A. Hodges and B.B. Warfield in defense of inerrancy.

Nor is quotation to be confounded with translation. It does not, like it, profess to give as exact a representation of the original, in all its aspects and on every side, as possible; but only to give a true account of its teaching in one of its bearings. There is thus always an element of application in quotation; and it is, therefore, proper in quotation to so alter the form of the original as to bring out clearly its bearing on the one subject in hand, thus throwing the stress on the element in it for which it is cited. This would be improper in a translation. The laws which ought to govern quotation seem, indeed, to have been very inadequately investigated by those who please the New Testament methods of quotation against inspiration.

(A.A. Hodge and B.B. Warfield, “Inspiration,” The Presbyterian Review 2/6 (April 1881) 256, emphasis in the original.)

Comments Off on Inexact Quotations vs. Inerrancy

Oct 07 2009

Jesus Did Systematic Theology

Filed under Jesus Christ,Theology

I grew up in a church background that did not encourage Systematic Theology. From childhood to adulthood, I grew up in a denomination that relied on the catechism and the teachings of the church. From young adulthood I grew in the Lord in a church that stressed Biblical Theology. Somewhere along the way I became interested in Systematic Theology.

In April 2008 I attended the “Together for the Gospel” conference. The first speaker, Lingon Duncan, spoke on the importance of sound doctrine. During that talk he stated that Jesus and Paul did systematic theology, so why shouldn’t we. That caught my attention. Dr. Duncan then gave the scriptural evidence for his assertion. These were the Scriptures he gave, and I heartily agreed.

And beginning at Moses and all the Prophets, He expounded to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning Himself…And they told about the things [that had happened] on the road, and how He was known to them in the breaking of bread. (Luke 24:27, 35 NKJV)

If it was good enough for Jesus, then I should be interested in it as well.


Comments Off on Jesus Did Systematic Theology

Sep 10 2009

The Name of Jesus in the Epistle to the Hebrews.

The following reading, The Name of Jesus in the Epistle to the Hebrews., is from F.E. Marsh’s 500 Bible Readings1.

  1. As Son of Man. “But we see Jesus, who was made a little lower than the angels for the suffering of death” (Heb. 2:9).
  2. As our High Priest. “We have a great High Priest, who is passed into the heavens, Jesus, the Son of God” (Heb. 4:14, and 6:20).
  3. As our Surety. “By so much was Jesus made a Surety of a better testament” (Heb. 7:22).
  4. As the Way into the holiest. “Having therefore, brethren, boldness to enter into the holiest by the blood of Jesus” (Heb. 10:19).
  5. As the Author of faith. “Looking unto Jesus, the Author and Finisher of our faith” (Heb. 12:2).
  6. As our Mediator. “And to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant” (Heb. 12:24)’
  7. As our Sanctifier. “Wherefore Jesus also, that He might sanctify the people with His own blood, suffered without the gate” (Heb. 13:12).


1. 500 Bible Readings, Marsh, F.E., (London: Marshall Brothers, 1897). Reading number 236.


Comments Off on The Name of Jesus in the Epistle to the Hebrews.

Jun 11 2009

Agape vs. Phileo

With respect to the Greek words agape and phileo, which are translated love in the English, note the following:

  • Phileo doesn’t denote a lesser love except contextually
  • Agape doesn’t denote divine love except contextually

I have heard many sermons stating that the word agape means God’s divine love and phileo is human brotherly love. But that is not true, as stated. It is only if the context requires it. Here are some examples that show where it is NOT true.

  • God the Father phileo the Son—John 5:20. Thus phileo can be used to denote God’s divine love. I wouldn’t think that the Father loves the Son with a human brotherly love.
  • Father phileo us and the Son—John 16:27
  • Jesus phileo John—John 20:2. God the Son, loved the Apostle John, and it uses the term phileo. I am sure that God the Son loved with a divine love.
  • God phileo, human agape—Pro 8:17 “I (God) phileo those who (humans) love agapeo me…”
  • The adulteress in Hosea 3 is committing a physical act of adultery, and it is described in the LXX as using a form of agapeo.

    “Then the LORD said to me, ‘Go again, love [1] a woman who is loved by a lover [1] and is committing adultery, just like the love [1] of the LORD for the children of Israel, who look to other gods and love [2] the raisin cakes of the pagans.'”—Hosea 3:1

    [1] root=agapeo [2] root=phileo

  • Agape as sexual—2 Sam 13:4; Songs 2:5-7:6
  • Phileo as sexual — Prov 7:18

Thayers lexicon makes the following disctinction between the two Greek words:

  • Agape – love based in choice; admiration, esteem, veneration; commanded in Mat 5:44;
  • Phileo – love based in emotion


Comments Off on Agape vs. Phileo

« Newer Posts - Older Posts »